Assignment 3: helping an international friend develop as a team leader

Did not submit or incompletely recommended whether or not your friend should insert herself as a coach from the beginning. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Partially recommended whether or not your friend should insert herself as a coach from the beginning. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily recommended whether or not your friend should insert herself as a coach from the beginning. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Thoroughly recommended whether or not your friend should insert herself as a coach from the beginning. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

2. Determine two (2) conflicts that could possibly arise as a result of asking people to work on days of religious significance. Propose concrete solutions for these two (2) possible conflicts.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely determined two (2) conflicts that could possibly arise as a result of asking people to work on days of religious significance. Did not submit or incompletely proposed concrete solutions for these two (2) possible conflicts.

Partially determined two (2) conflicts that could possibly arise as a result of asking people to work on days of religious significance. Partially proposed concrete solutions for these two (2) possible conflicts.

Satisfactorily determined two (2) conflicts that could possibly arise as a result of asking people to work on days of religious significance. Satisfactorily proposed concrete solutions for these two (2) possible conflicts.

Thoroughly determined two (2) conflicts that could possibly arise as a result of asking people to work on days of religious significance. Thoroughly proposed concrete solutions for these two (2) possible conflicts.

3. Determine whether or not cultural quirks could restrain the foreign manager from expressing his or her ideas readily. Provide a rationale for your response.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not cultural quirks could restrain the foreign manager from expressing his or her ideas readily. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Partially determined whether or not cultural quirks could restrain the foreign manager from expressing his or her ideas readily. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily determined whether or not cultural quirks could restrain the foreign manager from expressing his or her ideas readily. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Thoroughly determined whether or not cultural quirks could restrain the foreign manager from expressing his or her ideas readily. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

4. Determine two (2) actions that you can take in order to prepare yourself and your friend to become multicultural leaders. Provide two (2) examples to support your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely determined two (2) actions that you can take in order to prepare yourself and your friend to become multicultural leaders. Did not submit or incompletely provided two (2) examples to support your response.

Partially determined two (2) actions that you can take in order to prepare yourself and your friend to become multicultural leaders. Partially provided two (2) examples to support your response.

Satisfactorily determined two (2) actions that you can take in order to prepare yourself and your friend to become multicultural leaders. Satisfactorily provided two (2) examples to support your response.

Thoroughly determined two (2) actions that you can take in order to prepare yourself and your friend to become multicultural leaders. Thoroughly provided two (2) examples to support your response.

5. Predict two (2) major conflicts that may arise out of nonverbal communication misunderstandings (e.g., words misinterpreted, hand gestures, looks, shoulder shrugs, names of objects, etc.). Suggest two (2) actions that your friend could take in order to diffuse these types of misunderstandings and thus make the workplace more harmonious. Justify your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely predicted two (2) major conflicts that may arise out of nonverbal communication misunderstandings (e.g., words misinterpreted, hand gestures, looks, shoulder shrugs, names of objects, etc.). Did not submit or incompletely suggested two (2) actions that your friend could take in order to diffuse these types of misunderstandings and thus make the workplace more harmonious. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.

Partially predicted two (2) major conflicts that may arise out of nonverbal communication misunderstandings (e.g., words misinterpreted, hand gestures, looks, shoulder shrugs, names of objects, etc.).Partially suggested two (2) actions that your friend could take in order to diffuse these types of misunderstandings and thus make the workplace more harmonious. Partially justified your response.

Satisfactorily predicted two (2) major conflicts that may arise out of nonverbal communication misunderstandings (e.g., words misinterpreted, hand gestures, looks, shoulder shrugs, names of objects, etc.).Satisfactorily suggested two (2) actions that your friend could take in order to diffuse these types of misunderstandings and thus make the workplace more harmonious. Satisfactorily justified your response.

Thoroughly predicted two (2) major conflicts that may arise out of nonverbal communication misunderstandings (e.g., words misinterpreted, hand gestures, looks, shoulder shrugs, names of objects, etc.).Thoroughly suggested two (2) actions that your friend could take in order to diffuse these types of misunderstandings and thus make the workplace more harmonious. Thoroughly justified your response.

6. 5 references
Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

7. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting
Weight: 5%

Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

8. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and  reference section
Weight: 5%

Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.

In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.

Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.

In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.

9. Information Literacy/Integration of Sources
Weight: 5%

Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.

Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

10. Clarity and Coherence of Writing
Weight: 5%

Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.